LUCAS v. BARRINGER, MAYOR, et al

Messrs. Nathans Sinkler, for appellant, cite: Petition of majority of freeholders is necessary: Art. 2, Sec. 13, Const. 1895. Provision as to advertising not complied with: 31 Stat. 534, 535, 537. Submission of two purposes illegal: 31 Stat., 537; Art. 8, Sec. 7; Art. 10, Sec. 3., Const. 1895. Requirements as to passage of Act, with amendments, not complied with: Art. 16, Sec. 1; Art. 3, Sec. 18, Const. 1895. Mr. Philip H. Arrowsmith, for respondent, cites: Validating Act: 80 S.C. 518; 92 S.C. 318. Statute authorized joint submission of purposes of issue: 83 S.C. 546. Amendment of Act need not be read three times: 33 S.C. 57.