- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
EARLES v. GILHAM
Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 1, 1887
By the Court, HAWLEY, J.:
The order of the district court, allowing an amendment to appellants' motion for a new trial, having been reversed and set aside, upon an appeal taken therefrom by defendant Gilham, ( Earles v. Gilham, ante,) it follows from that decision that there is no statement, on motion for a new trial herein, which can be considered by this court; and, as it is not claimed that there is any error in the judgment roll, the judgment and order of the district court denying a new trial must be affirmed. It is so ordered.
Leonard, C. J. did not participate in this decision.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.