Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

SCHUMAKER v. MATHER

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Apr 26, 1892
Smart Summary (Beta)

Factual and Procedural Background

Clara A. Schumaker was the respondent, and Joshua Mather and others were the appellants in an appeal before the Court of Appeals of the State of New York. The court decided the matter on April 26, 1892. [1][2]

Legal Issues Presented

The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

Justice Gray read for affirmance, and all members of the court concurred. The opinion provides no further reasoning or analysis. [3][4]

Holding and Implications

Judgment affirmed. The lower-court judgment remained in effect against the appellants. The opinion discusses no broader implications and states no new precedent. [5]

Show all summary ...

GRAY, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.