Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

CUTTEN v. McCARTHY

Supreme Court of California,In Bank.
Sep 8, 1911
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

S.F. No. 5511, S.F. No. 5512, S.F. No. 5513.

Attorney(S)

Barclay Henley, and Arthur H. Barendt, in pro. per., for Appellant, Frank J. Murphy, for Respondent, John S. Martin. Cleveland L. Dam, George Appell, and A.L. O'Grady, for Respondents, P.H. McCarthy and Arthur M. Sharp. Percy V. Long, City Attorney, and F.J. English, Assistant City Attorney, Amici Curiæ, on petition for rehearing.

JUDGES

M. C. Sloss

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

THE COURT.

These cases being exactly similar in all particulars to Barendt v. McCarthy, S.F. No. 5507, ante, p. 680, in which the opinion was filed this day, the judgment of the lower court in each of them is, upon authority of that case, affirmed.

SLOSS, J., dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Barendt v. McCarthy, this day filed.

Beatty, C.J., and Angellotti, J., concurred.

Rehearing in each denied.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x