Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MUCKENFUSS v. RAILWAY COMPANY

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Apr 2, 1914
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

8779

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Sanders DePass and B.L. Abney, for the appellant, cite: Discretion must be governed by rule: 47 S.C. 498; 15 S.C. 328; 60 S.C. 140; 68 S.C. 37; 94 S.C. 17. Messrs. John T. Seibels and Stanyarne Wilson, for respondents, cite: Motion properly refused: 79 S.C. 469; 81 S.C. 355; 65 S.C. 224; 66 S.C. 17; 91 S.C. 424.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

April 2, 1914. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY.Page 50

This appeal is from an order of the Circuit Judge refusing a motion to require the complaint to be made more definite and certain in the particulars mentioned in the notice of motion.

The authorities cited in the brief of the respondents' attorneys fully sustain the ruling of the Circuit Court.

Appeal dismissed.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x