THOMAS PARKER COMPANY v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Factual and Procedural Background

The case captioned THOMAS PARKER COMPANY, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK and Others, Defendants, impleaded with FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, Respondent, was before the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department, in May 1917. The panel consisted of Clarke, P.J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ. The opinion is a short appellate disposition: the Appellate Division affirmed the judgment, with costs, citing authority in a prior case.

Legal Issues Presented

The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The opinion provides minimal reasoning. The court's dispositive statement is that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Bradley Son v. Huber Co. No further explanation, factual analysis, or legal elaboration is contained in the provided text.

Holding and Implications

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Direct effect: The appellate court affirmed the judgment below and awarded costs. The opinion does not discuss broader implications or articulate a new rule of law beyond applying the cited authority.