KING v. CENTRAL HARDWARE CO

PER CURIAM.

This court is of the opinion that the trial court committed error in admitting the record of the judgment recovered by plaintiff against defendant. Taliaferro v. Lane, 23 Ala. 369; Abraham v. Nicrosi, 87 Ala. 173, 6 So. 293. This question was not raised or adjudicated in this case on the former appeal. 200 Ala. 209, 75 So. 967.

Reversed and remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings in conformity herewith.

All the Justices concur.