BARLOW v. STATE

Hamilton Jones, of Evergreen, for appellant. Charge A should have been given for defendant. Code 1923, §§ 4644, 5635; 1 R. C. L. 165, 166. See Davidson v. State, 33 Ala. 350. No complaint was filed by the solicitor, and the record is insufficient to sustain a conviction. Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., and J. W. Brassell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. There is no merit in the assignment that no complaint was filed by the solicitor. Code 1923, § 4646. Evidence by the party to whom defendant sold whisky was admissible. Charge A does not correctly state the law. Burt v. State, 20 Ala. App. 296, 101 So. 768.