- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
KUSKE v. JEVNE
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Feb 17, 1928
Trial court's decision on motion to vacate attachment, reasonably supported by evidence, will not be reversed.
Where there is evidence, by affidavits or otherwise, reasonably tending to support the determination of the trial court on a motion to dissolve an attachment, its decision will not be reversed.
Appeal and Error, 4 C.J. p. 846 n. 3.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from an order vacating a writ of attachment and the levy thereunder.
On the showing made before the trial court there was dispute as to some of the facts, and the facts that were undisputed were such that different inferences and conclusions could reasonably be drawn therefrom. In that situation the rule announced in First State Bank v. Schatz, 104 Minn. 425, 116 N.W. 917, applies.
Affirmed.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.