Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

EARGLE v. EARGLE

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Jun 28, 1929
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

12691

Attorney(S)

Mr. James S. Verner, for appellant, cites: Existence of fiduciary relationship raises presumption of fraud: 61 S.C. 50; 110 S.C. 407. As to breach here: 13 Cyc., 704; 57 L.R.A., 458; 3 L.R.A., 836; 30 L.R.A., 214. Mr. C.T. Graydon, for respondent, cites: As to fraud: 19 S.C. 591; 64 S.C. 82; 93 S.C. 376; 90 S.C. 196; 96 S.C. 376; 110 S.C. 407. Cases distinguished: 110 S.C. 407; 61 S.C. 506.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

June 28, 1929. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE COTHRAN.

The Court is entirely satisfied with the decree of his Honor, Judge Mann, and, for the reasons stated by him, the decree is affirmed and made the judgment of this Court.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS, and MESSRS. JUSTICES BLEASE, STABLER, and CARTER concur.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x