Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

RESTAINO v. RESTAINO

Court of Errors and Appeals.
May 16, 1932
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

1. The testimony of the petitioning wife makes out a clear case of extreme cruelty.

2. The rule of corroboration only requires that belief in its truthfulness must find support in the testimony of others, or of surrounding established circumstances. This requirement has been met.

PER CURIAM.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Moore.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.