FISCHBEIN v. FISCHBEIN

Court of Errors and Appeals.

Oct 17, 1932

Judgment

CaseIQ

Important Paras

Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Defendant husband held in contempt for failing to pay — in fact, making no effort to pay — the weekly sum ordered by the court.

PER CURIAM.

The order under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.