- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
SEVERANCE v. SEVERANCE
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Jan 10, 1933
Per Curiam.
The provision of the final judgment of divorce "directing payments of money for the support of the plaintiff" (Civ. Pr. Act, ยง 1159) should be stricken out, the plaintiff having remarried, but without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to seek relief under the provisions of the contract of December 12, 1925. We express no opinion as to her right to support under such contract.
The order should be modified in accordance with this opinion and as so modified affirmed, without costs.
POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ., concur.
Ordered accordingly.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.