BANK v. CONSERVANCY DIST

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Appropriation of private property incidental to improvement — Section 6828 et seq., General Code — Jurisdiction of Common Pleas Court — Right of conservancy district to amend plan during trial.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS and DAY, JJ., concur.