- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
TENAGLIA v. TENAGLIA
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec 10, 1936
Argued November 17, 1936.
PER CURIAM, December 10, 1936:
Upon a review of the evidence in this case we are in general accord with the conclusions of the Master and the Court below. Since the argument the appellant has died. We shall decide the case — see Upperman v. Upperman, 119 Pa. Super. 341 — but no good purpose would be served by a review of the evidence.
The decree is affirmed.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.