Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

TENAGLIA v. TENAGLIA

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec 10, 1936

Argued November 17, 1936.

PER CURIAM, December 10, 1936:

Upon a review of the evidence in this case we are in general accord with the conclusions of the Master and the Court below. Since the argument the appellant has died. We shall decide the case — see Upperman v. Upperman, 119 Pa. Super. 341 — but no good purpose would be served by a review of the evidence.

The decree is affirmed.