Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

GILBERT v. ICKES

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Aug 4, 1941
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

No. 7912.

Attorney(S)

Daniel J. Hanlon, of Washington, D.C., and Wilbur E. Dow, Jr., of New York City, of the Bar of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for appellant. Nathan R. Margold, Sol., Leland O. Graham and David M. Hudson, Asst. Sol., Department of the Interior, W. Robert Koerner, of the Bar of Minnesota, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, and Vernon L. Wilkinson, Department of Justice, all of Washington, D.C., for appellees.

JUDGES

Duncan Lawrence Groner

Henry White Edgerton

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

RUTLEDGE, Associate Justice.

The appeal is from an order dismissing appellant's suit upon allegations identical in all substantial and material respects with those made in the complaint in Dow v. Ickes and Stimson, ___ App.D.C. ___, 123 F.2d 909, decided this day. The issues presented by the two cases are identical and the results must be the same. For the reasons which have been stated in the opinion which has been rendered in Dow v. Ickes and Stimson, the orders are affirmed.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x