WEBER v. PERRY

Mr. T.B. Bryant and Messrs. Felder and Rosen, all of Orangeburg, Counsel for Appellant, cite: As to contract for personal services coming within Statute of Frauds: Code of 1932, Sec. 7044; 60 S.C. 373, 38 S.E., 599, 181 S.C. 360, 187 S.E., 524; 27 C.J., 186; 27 C.J., 182; 27 C.J., 180; 46 S.C.L., 176; 187 S.C. 79, 196 S.E., 538; and cases therein discussed; 27 C.J., 176. As to lack of mutuality in alleged contracts for personal services: 182 S.C. 81, 188 S.E., 499. Messrs. Zeigler and Brailsford, of Orangeburg, counsel for Respondent, cite: As to Statute of Frauds being a bar to this action: 110 S.C. 534, 96 S.E., 538; 187 S.C. 79, 196 S.E., 539; 27 C.J., 183; 27 C.J., 188, Secs. 117, 118; 25 R.C.L., 478; Annotations in 35 A.L.R., 1440; 62 A.L.R., 234; 129 A.L.R., 544, Annotations; 164 S.W., 416, 41 L.Ed., 495. As to contract being terminable at will of Respondent: 35 A.J., 461; 167 Mass. 544; 24 Pa. Co. Ct., 403; 109 Okla. 161, 235 P., 502; 182 S.C. 81, 188 S.E., 499; Annotations in 35 A.L.R., beginning at p. 1432, and in 62 A.L.R., beginning at p. 234.