- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
COLUMBIA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. SACKETT
Factual and Procedural Background
Columbia Construction Co., Inc., and others appealed a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in a dispute involving the construction of a lease clause. [1][2]
Legal Issues Presented
- Whether the District Court correctly construed the disputed clause in the lease. [2]
Arguments of the Parties
The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.
Table of Precedents Cited
| Precedent | Rule or Principle Cited For | Application by the Court |
|---|---|---|
| 66 F. Supp. 629 | Construction of the lease clause at issue. | The Court of Appeals agreed that the District Court had construed the clause correctly. [2] |
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The Court stated that the appeal turned on the construction of a lease clause. It reviewed the District Court's construction and concluded that it was correct; the opinion provides no further analysis of the clause's language or application. [2]
Holding and Implications
The judgment was affirmed. [2] The decision left the District Court's judgment in effect. The opinion discusses no broader implications or new precedent.
PER CURIAM.
The question in this case turns on the construction of a clause in a lease. We think the District Court, 66 F. Supp. 629, construed the clause correctly. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Alert