Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

FELTMAN v. SAMMOND

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Oct 20, 1947
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

Nos. 9491, 9538.

Attorney(S)

Mr. Paul J. Sedgwick, of Washington, D.C., for appellants. Mr. David G. Bress, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Alvin L. Newmyer, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee Sammond. Mr. Joseph D. Bulman, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Sidney M. Goldstein, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee Wilding.

JUDGES

Henry White Edgerton

Elijah Barrett Prettyman

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, who were defendants in a personal injury action, contend among other things that the charge to the jury was defective and that the $20,000 verdict was excessive. We find no error either in the charge or elsewhere. It is settled that we cannot review a trial court's decision to grant or deny a new trial on the ground that a verdict was excessive or inadequate. Washington Times Co. v. Bonner, 66 App. D.C. 280, 86 F.2d 836, 110 A.L.R. 393.

Affirmed.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x