LORENZ v. INDEMNITY INS. CO. OF NORTH AMERICA

Per Curiam.

It plainly appears that at the time of the "robbery" plaintiffs' messenger or agent was not actually cognizant of the commission of the alleged felonious act as testified; indeed he was not aware of such act. The loss was not by reason of the "robbery" as defined in the policy.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

PECORA, EDER and HECHT, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.