IN RE SEITZ

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Guardian and ward — Proceeding to terminate guardianship — Bond — Necessity for two personal sureties — Section 10506-5, General Code — Bond signed by guardian as principal and one personal surety — Ample security provided — Guardian's appointment not void — Necessity for continuation of guardianship.

Per Curiam.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN and STEWART, JJ., concur.