- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
BARRICINI, INC. v. BARRICINI SHOES, INC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Mar 26, 1956
In an action to restrain the use of the name "Barricini" by respondents and for other relief, the appeal is from an order denying appellants' motion to restrain such use during the pendency of the action. Order affirmed, without costs. There was no showing by appellants of such irreparable injury and such a clear right to the relief demanded as would warrant the granting of a temporary injunction affording them substantially all the relief which they could obtain if they were successful after trial. (Cf. Clark v. King Bro. Pub. Co., 40 App. Div. 405, 408; Weiss v. Herlihy, 23 App. Div. 608, 612, and Tru Val Manufactures v. Tru-Valu Corner, 1 Misc.2d 844.) Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.