Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

VAN RAAS v. ROSENBAUM-GRINELL, INC

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
Feb 4, 1960

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff was not entitled to recover the item of $37.50 for advertising costs for a new position, since, in any event, same might have been incurred in advertising for a new position when her employment terminated at the end of the stated season, in December.

The judgment should be modified by reducing the recovery to the sum of $780, with interest and costs thereon and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs to plaintiff-respondent.

Concur — HECHT, J.P., AURELIO and TILZER, JJ.

Judgment modified, etc.