- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
VAN RAAS v. ROSENBAUM-GRINELL, INC
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
Feb 4, 1960
Per Curiam.
Plaintiff was not entitled to recover the item of $37.50 for advertising costs for a new position, since, in any event, same might have been incurred in advertising for a new position when her employment terminated at the end of the stated season, in December.
The judgment should be modified by reducing the recovery to the sum of $780, with interest and costs thereon and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs to plaintiff-respondent.
Concur — HECHT, J.P., AURELIO and TILZER, JJ.
Judgment modified, etc.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.