- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
BAKER v. SACKS, WARDEN
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Jun 14, 1961
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Habeas corpus — Not proper remedy to review irregularities in sentencing an accused.
Per Curiam.
Habeas corpus cannot be used to review alleged irregularities in the resentencing of an accused by a court of competent jurisdiction. Ex parte Shaw, 7 Ohio St. 81; Ex parte Hagan, 25 Ohio St. 426.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, BELL, RADCLIFF and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.
RADCLIFF, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of HERBERT, J.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.