Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MATTER OF CARDONA v. POWER

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
May 27, 1965
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Order affirmed, without costs. (See Matter of Camacho v. Doe, 7 N.Y.2d 762.)

Concur: Judges DYE, VAN VOORHIS, SCILEPPI and BERGAN. Chief Judge DESMOND dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum in which Judges FULD and BURKE concur.

Chief Judge DESMOND (dissenting).

I dissent and vote to reverse and to grant the prayer of the petition. Denial of voting rights to this competent, intelligent and reasonably well-educated and informed native-born American citizen, simply because she is unable to meet New York State's literacy-in-English requirements, is unreasonable and unconstitutionally discriminatory particularly since, by reason of the effective date of the literacy amendment to section 1 of article II of the State Constitution and the exceptions in section 168 of the Election Law, many persons are allowed to vote regardless of literacy.

Order affirmed.