BLUMENSTOCK v. WEISSMAN

Per Curiam.

In our opinion the holding of the County Court that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion to vacate its prior determination would be equally applicable to the Justice's Court had an application for similar relief been directed to that court in the first instance. (See Duran v. Chelsea Exch. Bank, 123 Misc. 158.)

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs.

MARGETT, BRENNER and OLLIFFE, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.