Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

N.L.R.B. v. RETAIL CLERKS INTERNAT'L ASS'N

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec 18, 1968
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

No. 22515.

Attorney(S)

Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Michael N. Sohn, Washington, D.C., (argued) and Thomas Silfen, Washington, D.C., Paul A. Cassady, Director, NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Charles M. Arak, (argued), Robert M. Dohrmann, (argued) of Arnold, Smith Schwartz, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Ted R. Frame, (argued), of Frame Courtney, Coalinga, Cal., for intervenor, State-Mart, Inc.

JUDGES

James Robert Browning

Benjamin Cushing Duniway

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order entered on July 23, 1967. The decision and order of the Board are reported at 166 N.L.R.B. No. 92. The trial examiner found that respondent union had violated section 8(b)(7)(C) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b) (7)(C), by picketing stores of an unorganized employer for more than 30 days, without filing an election petition and with a proscribed recognitional objective. The Board adopted the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the examiner. We are persuaded that those findings and conclusions are correct.

The order will be enforced.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x