Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

CITY OF PATERSON v. THE PATERSON GENERAL HOSPITAL

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 17, 1969
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Mr. Adolph A. Romei argued the cause for appellant. Mr. John W. Griggs argued the cause for respondent Paterson General Hospital ( Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd Griggs, attorneys; Mr. Richard J. Ryan, on the brief). Mr. Joseph L. Conn and Mr. Arthur C. Dwyer argued the cause for respondent City of Paterson ( Mr. Conn, attorney; Mr. Dwyer, of counsel). Mr. Kenneth M. Olex argued the cause for respondent Attorney General ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, attorney).

JUDGES

PER CURIAM.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM.

A petition for certification was filed to review the judgment of the Appellate Division approving a settlement of the litigation. We heard argument on the application as if certification was granted. The petition for certification is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed upon the agreement of the respondents that paragraph 5 of the contract does not mean that the Paterson General Hospital will be relieved, by virtue of that contract, of all obligation to the people of the City of Paterson at the end of the 20-year period mentioned in that paragraph.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x