YOUNG v. PHILA. SCHOOL DISTRICT

OPINION PER CURIAM, April 22, 1971:

Judgment affirmed. See, Carlo v. Scranton, 319 Pa. 417, 179 A. 561 (1935).

Mr. Justice ROBERTS dissents for the reasons most recently noted in Smeltz v. Copeland, 440 Pa. 224, 226, 269 A.2d 466, 468 (1970) (dissenting opinion) and once again urges that the unwise and unjust doctrine of governmental immunity be abolished.

Mr. Justice POMEROY dissents for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in Laughner v. Allegheny County, 436 Pa. 572, 576, 261 A.2d 607 (1970).