- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
UNITED STATES v. RANDOLPH
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 26, 1972
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this passing counterfeit currency case is affirmed.
We reject the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. There are many scraps of evidence, each of which alone means little, put together they could mean a lot to a jury.
On the facts here, disbelief of Randolph's testimony could lead to some affirmative inferences of knowledge.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.