- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PFOHL v. WIPPERMAN
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Mar 21, 1974
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Order affirmed, with costs to defendants-respondents, in the following memorandum: Our court has jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. We conclude, however, that there are presented only questions of fact as to the weight of the evidence and no question of law. Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division is outside our power of review. ( Armstrong v. Campbell, 30 N.Y.2d 704; Cameron v. Permakoff, 28 N.Y.2d 938; Indiere v. Strickroth, 28 N.Y.2d 513; Musumeci v. Pillsbury Mills, 11 N.Y.2d 948; Gutin v. Mascali Sons, 11 N.Y.2d 97; see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev. ed.], ยง 148, p. 588.)
Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN and STEVENS.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.