Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

DOCK WATCH HOLLOW QUARRY PIT, INC. v. WARREN TP

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Sep 12, 1977
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Mr. Frederick C. Mezey argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent ( Messrs. Mezey and Mezey, attorneys; Mr. Mezey, of counsel and on the brief; Mr. Mark L. Antin, on the brief). Mr. J. Albert Mastro argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant ( Mr. Mastro and Ms. Dolores A. Mastro, on the brief). Mr. Daniel F. O'Connell argued the cause for cross-respondent ( Messrs. Lanigan and O'Connell, attorneys).

JUDGES

PER CURIAM.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division.

Justice Schreiber would affirm the judgment of the trial court as modified by the dissenting opinion of Judge Morgan, reported at 142 N.J. Super. 130.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and HANDLER — 6.

Dissenting — Justice SCHREIBER — 1.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x