Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. BERRY

Michigan Court of Appeals.
Sep 20, 1978
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant pled guilty to robbery armed, MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797, and possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony, MCL 750.227b; MSA 28.424(2).

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to withdraw his plea because there was an inadequate factual basis. We find that the proper factual basis was established and that the trial court did not err.

However, we do not believe defendant's conviction under the felony-firearm statute is constitutionally valid. See Wayne County Prosecutor v Recorder's Court Judge, 85 Mich. App. 727; 272 N.W.2d 587 (1978), People v Mitchell, 85 Mich. App. 757; 272 N.W.2d 601 (1978) (N.J. KAUFMAN, J., dissenting), People v Gerald Hughes, 85 Mich. App. 8; 270 N.W.2d 692 (1978) (D.F. WALSH, J., dissenting). Though we find the robbery armed charge a necessarily included offense of the felony-firearm charge, we choose to vacate the conviction under the felony-firearm statute and affirm the robbery armed conviction. Wayne County Prosecutor v Recorder's Court Judge, supra.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

N.J. KAUFMAN, P.J. (concurring).

I concur separately for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinions in People v Walter Johnson 85 Mich. App. 654; 272 N.W.2d 605 (1978), People v Mitchell, 85 Mich. App. 757; 272 N.W.2d 601 (1978), and People v Drake Johnson, 85 Mich. App. 752; 272 N.W.2d 599 (1978).