- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
DIZICK v. UMPQUA COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Oregon Court of Appeals.
Jan 16, 1979
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
JOHNSON, J.
Roberts, J., dissenting opinion.
JOHNSON, J.
This case was remanded to this court by the Supreme Court for reconsideration. In light of the decision in McBride v. Magnuson, 282 Or. 433, 578 P.2d 1259 (1978), we conclude that the majority and concurring opinions reported in Dizick v. Umpqua Community College, 33 Or. App. 559, 577 P.2d 534 (1978), are not inconsistent with McBride. We adhere to our original decision.
Affirmed.
ROBERTS, J., dissent.
I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Dizick v. Umpqua Community College, 33 Or. App. 559, 570, 577 P.2d 534, 539 (1978).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.