Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

WOLF v. WOHL

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.
Jun 19, 1980
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

MEMORANDUM.

Order is unanimously reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed.

A lease is both a contract and a conveyance of an estate or interest in land (1 Rasch, New York Landlord and Tenant [2d ed], ยงยง 2, 3). Since the lease and occupancy of the apartment are inextricably related to the sale of shares in the co-operative corporation (see Matter of State Tax Comm. v Shor, 43 N.Y.2d 151, 157; Frank v Rubin, 59 Misc.2d 796), a contract to pay compensation for services rendered in negotiating the sale of such shares comes within the purview of section 5-701 Gen. Oblig. of the General Obligations Law and section 442-d Real Prop. of the Real Property Law (see Frank v Rubin, supra; Sebel v Williams, 88 Misc.2d 411). The plaintiff herein was not a licensed real estate broker or a salesperson and the agreement to pay commission was not in writing. Accordingly, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover commissions.

Concur: PITTONI, P.J., SLIFKIN and O'GORMAN, JJ.