Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

McINTYRE v. WRIGHT

Oregon Supreme Court.
Apr 6, 1982
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

CA 19231, SC 28239

Attorney(S)

Darrell E. Bewley, Appellate Counsel, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the brief were K.R. Maloney, General Counsel, and James A. Blevins, Chief Trial Counsel, Salem. Stanton F. Long, Deputy Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief were David B. Frohnmayer, Attorney General, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Al J. Laue, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

TANZER, J.

Reversed.

TANZER, J.

This is a post-decree garnishment proceeding in a dissolution suit. The trial court allowed a continuing garnishment against defendant's workers' compensation benefits in the hands of the insurer. The Court of Appeals modified.

The issues in this case are identical to those presented in the case of Satterfield v. Satterfield, 292 Or. 780, 643 P.2d 336 (1982) (decided this date). Our decision in this case is based upon the reasons expressed in our opinion in Satterfield.

The Court of Appeals allowance of the garnishment is reversed.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x