- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
R.C. HILTON ASSOC. v. STAN MUSIAL BIGGIE'S
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jun 9, 1983
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING [2] (Opinion April 11, 1983, 11 Cir., 1983, 702 F.2d 907)
PER CURIAM:
R.C. Hilton Associates, Inc. requests a rehearing based on the contention that this court's treatment of its claim for tortious interference with a business relationship, see 702 F.2d 907 (11th Cir. 1983), is inconsistent with Florida law. In our earlier opinion we did not intend to imply that an enforceable contract between plaintiff and a third party is an essential element of a claim for tortious interference with a business relationship. Hilton's claim fails because he did not establish the existence of an advantageous relationship with Stan Musial and Biggie's, Inc.
The petition for rehearing is DENIED.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.