Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEARLINA INNIS v. STATE OF NEW YORK

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Sep 20, 1983
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

MEMORANDUM.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs.

The determination of an application to file a late claim pursuant to subdivision 6 of section 10 CTC of the Court of Claims Act is within the discretion of the court below. ( Bay Terrace Coop. Section IV v New York State Employees' Retirement System, 55 N.Y.2d 979, 981.) Absent an abuse of discretion, not present here, that determination is nonreviewable by this court. (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev ed], pp 353-354, 368-369.)

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.