- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
HAMILTON v. UNITED STATES
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Sep 22, 1983
PER CURIAM.
We agree with the district court, 564 F. Supp. 1146, that the Feres doctrine bars this action. Under the facts, we cannot recognize a duty to follow up because this would mean creating continuous onsets of new causes of action extending beyond the period of active service.
Affirmed.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.