Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

HAMILTON v. UNITED STATES

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Sep 22, 1983

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the district court, 564 F. Supp. 1146, that the Feres doctrine bars this action. Under the facts, we cannot recognize a duty to follow up because this would mean creating continuous onsets of new causes of action extending beyond the period of active service.

Affirmed.