QUIGLEY v. WOODALL

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed without opinion pursuant to Rule 59 of this court.

All the Justices concur, except Hill, C. J., who concurs specially and Smith, J., not participating.

HILL, Chief Justice, concurring specially.

I write simply to point out that, in my view, when neighbors of rezoned property seek to show that the rezoning power is being manifestly abused to the oppression of the neighbors, see Cross v. Hall County, 238 Ga. 709, 711 ( 235 S.E.2d 379) (1977), they must do so by objective evidence, not the subjective intent of the county commissioners, and hence the taking of the depositions of the county commissioners is unnecessary.