PEOPLE v. SUTTON, HARRIS

Judgments affirmed.

Although certain inconsistencies appear in the testimony of the prosecution witnesses, and the complaining witness himself had a criminal record, "resolution of credibility * * * [was] properly for the trier of fact" ( People v La Borde, 76 A.D.2d 869, 870; People v Rosenfeld, 93 A.D.2d 872). We are "traditionally resistant to second-guessing [a] determination on this issue" ( People v Di Girolamo, 108 A.D.2d 755), and the facts adduced in the case at bar "do not compel the conclusion that a reasonable doubt existed as a matter of law" ( People v La Borde, supra, p 870). Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.