CATANIA v. CATANIA

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to defendant husband's contention, Special Term was not obligated to consider the nine specific factors enumerated in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6) (a) in determining this application for pendente lite relief ( see, Lewis v. Lewis, 103 A.D.2d 714; Belfiglio v. Belfiglio, 99 A.D.2d 462; Berley v Berley, 97 A.D.2d 726; Liss v. Liss, 87 A.D.2d 681). Special Term's decision, in which it set forth the reasons for the determination reached, complied with the statutory directive (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [b]; [7] [d]). Under the circumstances, Special Term's awards of pendente lite relief were not excessive. Mollen, P.J., Lazer, Mangano and Brown, JJ., concur.