- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
E-Z PARKS, INC. v. LARSON
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jan 31, 1986
Smart Summary (Beta)
Factual and Procedural Background
This appeal arose from an order of the Commonwealth Court entered September 12, 1985, reported at 91 Pa. Commw. 600 and 498 A.2d 1364 (1985). [1]
Legal Issues Presented
The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.
Arguments of the Parties
The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.
Table of Precedents Cited
| Precedent | Rule or Principle Cited For | Application by the Court |
|---|---|---|
| 91 Pa. Commw. 600, 498 A.2d 1364 (1985) | The opinion does not identify a specific rule or principle. | The cited decision is identified as the Commonwealth Court order from which the appeal was taken. [1] |
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The court issued a brief per curiam order and provided no substantive analysis. It affirmed the Commonwealth Court's order. [1][2]
Holding and Implications
ORDER AFFIRMED. The Commonwealth Court's order remained in effect. [2]
The opinion discusses no broader implications; no new precedent was set.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Order affirmed.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.