- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. BARBOUR
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Apr 7, 1986
Judgment affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's claim, the court properly admitted into evidence the tape-recorded conversation between himself and Police Officer Curie. Police Officer Curie's testimony that the tape recording was a true and accurate record of his conversation with the defendant, and that nothing had been deleted or added to the conversation, provided a sufficient foundation for the admission of the tape into evidence (see, People v. McGee, 49 N.Y.2d 48, cert denied sub nom. Waters v. New York, 446 U.S. 942; People v. Arena, 48 N.Y.2d 944; People v. Tayeh, 96 A.D.2d 1045). Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.