PEOPLE v. HARRISON

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The claims of error based on the prosecutor's comments during summation were largely unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (see, People v Arce, 42 N.Y.2d 179, 190; People v Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951, 953), and those errors that were preserved did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396, 399; People v Jalah, 107 A.D.2d 762). Furthermore, there is no reason to disturb the defendant's sentences (see, People v Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305; People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 86). Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.