- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. ROSEMOND
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Jan 23, 1987
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We have reviewed all the issues presented on appeal and find them to be without merit. Among the issues raised, defendant contends that the prosecutor made prejudicial remarks during his summation. As there was no objection made by defense counsel during the summation, the alleged prejudicial statements were not preserved for appellate review (People v. Balls, 69 N.Y.2d 641). In any event, the remarks were not a part of a pervasive pattern of misconduct, and defendant was not thereby deprived of his right to a fair trial (People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396; People v. Demming, 116 A.D.2d 886).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.