Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

JOHNSON v. HENDRICKS

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Dec 3, 1987
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

Nos. 85-2708 to 85-2720.

Attorney(S)

Gerald L. Bader, Jr. (Pamela N. Hultin, and Ann L. Duckett with him on the brief), Bader Cox, Denver, Colo., for plaintiff-appellant. Stuart N. Bennett (Mark J. Appelton, Roath Brega, P.C., Denver, Colo., Shannon A. Robinson and Lynda H. Knowles, Richard J. Spelts, P.C., Denver, Colo., James R. Figg, Warkentine, Figg Gerdes, Broomfield, Colo., J. Lawrence Hamil and Richard C. Morris, Hamil Professional Corp., Denver, Colo., Craig D. Joyce, Walters Theis, Denver, Colo., Maurice Reuler and Robert W. Becker, Mason, Reuler and Peek Professional Corp., Denver, Colo., John A. Studholme and Fred W. Clifford, Boulder, Colo., Jeffrey L. Smith and Sheldon L. Abramson, Cohen Brame Smith, Denver, Colo., with him on the briefs), Roath Brega, P.C., Denver, Colo., for defendants-appellees.

JUDGES

Stephanie Kulp Seymour

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by James P. Johnson, as equity receiver on behalf of the claimants of Chilcott Commodities Corporation and various other entities, to recover amounts paid to investors in excess of their contributions. The district court granted defendant investors' motions to dismiss. Johnson v. Studholme, 619 F. Supp. 1347 (D.Colo. 1985). The receiver has appealed.

We affirm substantially for the reasons given by the trial court. We are not persuaded that any of the arguments made on appeal by the receiver undermine the conclusions reached by that court.

AFFIRMED.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x