- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
KERPA v. A A BROTHERS, INC
Appellate Court of Connecticut
Dec 22, 1987
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff's first, second and sixth claims of error were not raised in the trial court; consequently, we will not consider those claims. The plaintiff's third, fourth and fifth claims of error invoke the discretionary function of the court. Our review of the record, transcript and briefs fails to disclose any abuse of such discretion.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.