CITRUS CENTRAL v. GARDNER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants have moved for remand of this appeal, showing that no transcript of the hearing can be prepared and that the parties and the deputy commissioner have been unable to prepare a satisfactory statement of the evidence. Under the circumstances, we must reverse and remand for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

ERVIN, BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.