Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. DUDLEY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Dec 18, 1989

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The uncontroverted testimony at the hearing established that the telephone call in question was never memorialized. Thus, the defendant is not entitled to a reversal of the judgment of conviction on the theory that material to which she was entitled under People v Rosario (supra) was withheld from her.

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.